Ex-Lagos Attorney-General, ‘Supo Shasore Challenges Court’s Jurisdiction In Alleged Money Laundering Case

The trial of former Lagos State Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice, Olasupo Shasore, SAN, before a Federal High Court, sitting in Lagos, has been stalled due to his fresh application, challenging the Court’s jurisdiction to try him.

Sashore is being tried by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, over alleged offences bordering on money laundering.

The EFCC in a charge No. FHC/L/447C/2022, accused Sashore of accepting, transacting and making cash payments of $100,000USD, which exceeded the amount authorized by Law, without going through a financial institution.

He was alleged to have paid the said amount to Olufolakemi Adelore and Ikechukwu Oguine.

Sashore alleged acts, according to the EFCC, contravened Sections 78(c), 1(a) and 16(1)(d) and 18(c) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Sections 16(6) and 16(2)(b)of the same Act.

The defendant had pleaded not guilty to the charges when he was arraigned and was accordingly admitted to bail in the sum of fifty-million-naira with a surety in like sum.

The surety, the judge ordered must be a serving Director or a Permanent Secretary in the service of the Federation or the Lagos State Government. The Surety must also produce two copies each of his or her recent passport photograph and evidence of payment of tax or tax clearance.

Justice Chukwujekwu Joseph Aneke also ordered the former Attorney-General to deposit his international passport with the Court’s registrar, pending the trial.

At the resumed hearing of the charge today, EFCC Prosecutor, Abba Mohammed, urged the Court to allow him to call the eight witness to testify in the matter.

However, Sashore’s lawyers led by Olawale Akoni and Chijioke Okoye, both Senior Advocates of Nigeria, SAN, told the Court that their clients have filed an application, challenging the Court’s jurisdiction to entertain the charge.

Sashore’s application, challenging the Court’s jurisdiction, is basically a motion to strike out the charge for want of jurisdiction.

The application, in the alternative, is asking the Court for “an order for the Prosecution to avail it with all relevant documents in their possession not disclosed or absent from the proof of evidence and needed for a robust defence of the matter”.

But the Prosecutor, Abba Mohammed, told the Court that the application was served in his office last Friday, after they had closed for work, adding that he was just seeing that application this morning.

He noted that the documents demanded for by the defence did not have anything to do with the defendant.

He however, stated that the defendant’s application cannot stall the scheduled trial, and urged the Court to proceed with the trial.

But the Presiding Judge, Justice Aneke, held that there is need for the Court to first hear the application, challenging its jurisdiction on the matter before further proceedings.

Consequently, Justice Aneke while adjourned the matter till March 26, for hearing of the defendant’s application, challenging its jurisdiction, and also urged the Prosecutor to file and serve the defendant and make available all documents requested for by the defence team.

The charges against the former Attorney-General and Commissioner for Justice reads: “That you Olasupo Shasore, S.A.N. on or about the 18th day of November 2014 in Lagos within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court induced Olufolakemi Adelore to commit an offence, to wit accepting cash payment of the sum of US100,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand United States Dollars) without going through a financial institution which such exceeded the amount authorized by Law and you thereby committed an offence contrary to section 78(c) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under section 16(6) of the same Act.

“That you Olasupo Shasore, S.A.N on or about the 18th day of November 2014 in Lagos within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, in a transaction without going through a financial institution, made cash payment of the sum of USD 100,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand United States Dollars) to Olufolakemi Adelore through Auwalu Habu and Wole Aboderin, which sum exceeded the amount permitted by Law and you thereby committed an offence contrary to sections 1(a) and 16(1)(d) the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as Amended) and punishable under section 16(2)(b) of the same Act.”

“That you Olasupo Shasore, S.A.N., on or about the 18th November, 2014, in Lagos within the jurisdiction of this honourable Court, induced one Ikechukwu Oguine, to commit an offence, to wit: accepting case payment of the sum of USD100,000.00 (One Hundred thousand United States Dollars) without going through a financial institution, which such amount exceeded the amount permitted by Law and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 78(c) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under section 16(6) of the same Act.”1(a) and 16(1)(d) the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as Amended) and punishable under section 16(2)18(c) of the Money Laundering Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 16 (2)(b) Of the same Act.

“That you Olasupo Shasore, SAN on or about the 18th day of November 2014 in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, without going through a financial institution and made cash payment of the sum of USD100,000.00 (One Hundred thousand United State Dollars) to one Ikechukwu Oguine which sum exceeded the amount permitted by Law and you thereby committed an offence contrary sections 1(a) and 16(1),(d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition Act, as amended) and punishable under section 16 (2)(b) of the same Act”.

Share the story
_For Advert Placement, Media Consultancy, Anniversary & Birthday Celebrations, kindly contact us:

@ [email protected] Or call: 09060006367

You are also free to call/send what's happening in your environment/area to us through the above contact._

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply